Dog Training-our Philosophy

Dog training, like teaching any subject requires the trainer to combine a shifting blend of knowledge, science, pedagogy, intuition, art, and a touch of voodoo. All behaviour is based in reinforcement, and successfully modifying it depends on the trainer understanding the science behind modifying behaviours,being able to communicate clearly with the subject, and effectively guiding the subject to change their behaviour in the direction the teacher/trainer desires.  As great trainer Bob Bailey has said, “Training is simple but not easy”.

All living beings need to be taught how to function within their society, what behaviours are acceptable, and which are not. Humans only need to learn how to behave and to communicate between one another, but our dogs must learn rules both for canine interaction and also to navigate the strange world of the humans with whom they live; a species that typically ignores or misinterprets the dog’s main method of communicating (body language), and insists that the dog understand the constant stream of meaningless gibberish emitted from our mouths, that erroneously attributes human motivation and emotions to a species that is hard wired completely differently.

Everyone needs to learn impulse control and greeting rituals. Think for a moment about the difference between common greeting rituals in humans (handshake, hug, one or two cheek kiss…) and dogs (circular approach, butt sniff, pee and scrape).  Dogs and people are indeed two very different species. Imagine if you greeted someone at a cocktail party by circling behind them and bending down for a good butt sniff!

All too frequently humans attribute human rationales to animal behaviour (he is stubborn, spiteful, etc.) instead of trying to determine the animal’s underlying emotional state, and then arranging scenarios to change the behavioural response to something positive by the trainer’s criteria.

It is up to us to help our dogs to understand the arbitrary and strange rules of human society and to gently and lovingly teach them what behaviours we would like them to do.  We do not believe in using force or coercion to teach dogs. Unidos para los Animales uses Force-Free training, which we understand to mean: No Shock, No Pain, No Choke, No Fear, No Physical Force, No physical Molding, No Compulsion Based Methods are employed to train or care for a pet. 

We created this page to help adopters with common training questions and problems. We are constantly looking for the clearest (to the dog),  most humane, and most effective training techniques. We also realise that not every adopter will be as training-obsessed as we are.  So  with that in mind, we will write clear, concise blogs to help to educate owners and to facilitate communication between owners and their dogs. We will post links to the best of the best in the online training community (with attribution to each contributor). And we will answer training questions as clearly as we can, and refer to qualified professionals.

Good trainers read about animals. They read a LOT!  We are blessed to live in a time where the internet  allows us access to the world’s best trainers, no matter where in the world we live. We are lucky that many superb trainers publish excellent books, blogs, and guides and several even create and post clear, helpful video tutorials on You Tube that we can watch for free.

With that in mind, we present Unidos para los Animales training credo based on and paraphrased in an article by trainer Emily Larlham (Kikopup, Dogmantics).

Progressive Reinforcement Training Manifesto

A type of animal training exists that involves no form of intimidation, confrontation, violence, reprimands, or domination. This non-violent type of training has gone under many names: “Clicker Training,” “Positive Training,” “Positive Reinforcement Training,” and “Reward Training,” among others.   There is a need for a more specific, more accurate, more inspirational term.  The above terms have been used so loosely in recent years that they have lost their original meanings.  How has this happened?  Trainers who use compulsion methods may incorporate a clicker (a noise maker to mark desirable behaviour) and refer to themselves as a “Clicker Trainers.”  Trainers who use painful or intimidating methods may include food or toy rewards in their training and refer to themselves as “Reward Trainers” or “Positive Reinforcement Trainers.”  It is already possible that a member of the public may seek the guidance of a trainer who claims to be “Positive,” only to find out that this trainer routinely uses physical violence towards animals. I propose a new term that trainers and members of the general public can use to refer to this type of modern training – a training system that is not only humane, compassionate, and reliable, but is also based on the latest scientific studies.  Because this form of training constantly incorporates the latest and most reliable scientific findings, and because it furthers an evolutionary progress toward a more harmonious relationship between humans and the animals who live with them, it shall be referred to as Progressive Reinforcement Training.

Progressive Reinforcement Training essentially means teaching animals by rewarding desired behaviours and excluding the intentional use of physical or psychological intimidation.

Progressive Reinforcement Training means:

1) Training by rewarding desirable behaviours so they will be more likely to occur in the future, while preventing reinforcement of behaviours that are undesirable.

An example:  Letting a dog walk forward while the leash remains loose to sniff a bush as a reward for not pulling, while not letting the dog reach the bush if the leash becomes tight (so that pulling on leash is never rewarded).

Another example: If you are training a dog to greet guests politely, you first reinforce the dog for calmly keeping all four feet on the floor (not jumping) in exciting situations, and then when the dog does jump up, you remove your attention briefly (by turning away from the dog- as attention is rewarding). However, if you simply tried to train a dog not to jump up by turning away from the dog repeatedly without rewarding him for the correct choices – the dog could become frustrated.  It is true that if the dog figures out that the jumping is not getting attention, the dog will try an alternate behaviour–however, a dog will more likely try jumping higher, barking, whining, and nipping over standing still or sitting for attention. By rewarding the dog for what you want him to do first, you give the dog a default behaviour to try when what he is doing is not working.

Examples of Rewards:

Food, toys, attention, people, other animals, running, sniffing, swimming,  going outside, coming inside etc.

An important point to remember here is that it is the animal that chooses what is rewarding, not the trainer. The trainer must be able to “read’ the animal and use rewards that have value to the animal in different situations.  Many rewards will not be effective if the animal is full or stressed.

2) Interrupting and preventing undesirable behaviours without physical or psychological intimidation, as well as rewarding an alternate response (training a desirable behaviour in it’s place).

An example: If you want to train a dog to stay off your couch, you train the dog to do what you want him to do first.  That is, you train him to go and lie on his dog-bed.  Then when he does try to get up on the couch, you interrupt him and redirect him to the appropriate location (his dog bed) so that climbing onto the couch remains unreinforced. During the training process you, also use management and prevention: while you are away from the house, you block the dog’s access to the couch, as he would likely choose to lie on the couch – and be reinforced for it – in your absence.

You can interrupt an animal’s undesirable behaviour so that he is not self-rewarded without using physical or mental intimidation.  To do this, you can train the animal to respond to an attention cue or a recall: something that means, “stop what you are doing and look at me”, or “stop what you are doing and come here immediately”.

 3) Taking an animal’s emotional state and stress levels into account.

Trainers practicing Progressive Reinforcement read an animal’s body language to the best of their ability for signs of stress or arousal and adjust their training approach accordingly.

Example: Removing a dog that is offering stress signals from a situation where a child is chasing or pestering the dog.

4) Socialising and teaching an animal to cope with his environment using reinforcement.

You can use Progressive Reinforcement Training to socialise and teach an animal to cope with his environment by letting him experience low or non-stressful situations in which the animal is likely to succeed and earn rewards for desirable behaviour.  You can then increase difficulty and distractions as the animal succeeds, with the goal of creating a confident well-adjusted animal.

An example: Teaching an animal to be relaxed and calm while being handled or restrained by using reinforcement.  Pavlov’s dog was trained to have a new emotional response to a bell because the sound of a bell was followed by food. You can train your dog to enjoy handling, very simply put, by touching the dog and then feeding the dog a treat, and increase the invasiveness as the dog remains unstressed by the situation.  If the dog were to shy away, the trainer would have to go back a step to where the dog was comfortable (Classical Conditioning).

 5) Using a marker to train, whether it be a clicker, some other noise-maker, your voice or touch, or a visual marker.  Or, on the other hand, not using a marker, and instead for example reinforcing an animal by feeding a treat directly to his mouth.

A marker is used to pinpoint behaviour.  It tells an animal that what he is doing at that exact moment in time will win him reinforcement.

For example: If a dog sits, the trainer can click as the dog is sitting, and then feed the dog a treat.  Or the trainer can say, “Yes!” in a positive tone as the dog is sitting and then feed the dog a treat or release the dog to get a toy or go out the door.

Reinforcing behaviour is also possible without using a marker, but the dog will understand the game much more quickly if the trainer uses a marker sound of some kind.  For example, you can feed a dog a treat for looking at another dog to change his emotional response to the other dog (Classical Conditioning).  You can also reinforce your dog for calmly lying around the house or outside by tossing him a treat between his paws while he is not expecting the treat and he will be more likely to repeat the behaviour in the future.

 6) Employing humane, effective, respectful training based on the latest scientific evidence.

A commitment to Progressive Reinforcement Training means strictly following all of the above principles – not just in training sessions, but during 100% of the time spent with an animal.

Progressive Reinforcement Training does not mean:

1) The intentional use of physical or psychological intimidation.

Using your voice, touch, body language, a device, or the environment to intimidate an animal for the purpose of continuing, initiating or ending the animal’s behaviour.

Examples: staring at an animal, intentionally leaning over him, poking, jerking, shocking, squirting with water, startling with a noise, or using your voice in an intimidating way to suppress behaviour (saying “no” or “eh!”).

 2) Intentionally disregarding an animal’s stress levels or signals.

Intentionally putting an animal in overly stressful situations in which he cannot cope, rather than exposing the animal in a way that he is under his threshold (the animal can make choices and cope).

Example: Forcing an animal to meet a stranger while the animal is offering a wide range of stress and avoidance signals.

Example:  Dragging an animal across a surface he is frightened of and refuses to cross, instead of teaching the animal to feel confident and calm crossing the surface using Counter Conditioning (rewarding the animal for choosing to take steps across the floor until the animal is confident to cross calmly on his own)

 3) Holding selfish or uncompassionate goals for your training.

Intentionally putting an animal at risk for physical or emotional damage to satisfy ones own interests.

A commitment to Progressive Reinforcement means never intentionally using the intimidatory tactics above – never in training sessions, and never during any other time spent with an animal.

Why refrain from using Physical or Psychological Intimidation? 

For scientific, moral, ethical and humane reasons. Using these forms of conditioning can produce unwanted side effects in addition to the basic trauma they do to an animal.

The many problems with using physical or psychological intimidation:

1) Without perfect timing, intensity, and consistency, the “training” amounts to nothing more than abuse.

2) The animal learns to avoid the punisher in order to indulge in undesirable behaviour.

3)  These techniques can cause irreversible emotional damage to the animal and break the bond of trust with you and the animal.

4) Punishment can increase stress hormones, arousal, and aggression.

5) Animals can habituate to the punishment – meaning that the intensity of the punishment must keep increasing to have any effect as the animal learns to endure it.

6) You cannot change an animal’s basic emotional response to find children, adults, or other animals (or anything for that matter) reinforcing by using intimidation; you can only suppress the dog’s punished behaviours.

7)  Intimidation can cause dogs to hide their warning signs before attempting to bite.

8) Dogs trained with punishment can feel trapped by their handlers, since the decision to leave a ‘stay’ or to leave the handler’s side (to escape from a bothersome child, for example) can cause punishment.  Animals who feel they have no escape tend to bite rather than move away.

9) Intended intimidation can actually increase the behaviour you wish to extinguish, as intimidation involves giving a form of attention to an animal.

10) The presence of the punisher becomes less reinforcing for the animal.  If you punish your dog using intimidation, it is harder to compete with the reinforcement value of other things in the environment.  Your dog will find other stimuli in the environment more reinforcing than you as the dog increasingly associates you with punishment rather than reward.

11) Dogs who have been trained with physical or psychological intimidation do not offer behaviours on their own as readily when asked, making complex behaviours difficult to train. Training becomes something they must “endure”, rather than something that they consider fun, and a chance to interact with and bond with their trainer.

12) Handlers who use intimidation as punishment will punish their animals more readily in the future as punishment is rewarding to the handlers themselves (they get the result they wanted- hitting a dog made it stop barking, so they will be more likely to hit the dog in the future).  In other words, using physical or psychological intimidation causes one’s own behavior patterns to change.

In conclusion, Progressive Reinforcement Training is not a permissive form of training.  It requires providing consequences to all behaviors.  The trainer takes on the role of a benevolent leader and guide using these ethical and scientifically based methods.